Masih bahas tentang Snape, sebagai one of Snape Defender Army, aku 
merasa perlu meneruskan perkamen ini. Jangan teruskan baca postingan 
ini kalau belum selesai baca HBP ya. 

===
WARNING
Don't read the rest of this article unless you've finished Harry 
Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. The predictions for book 7 will 
necessarily involve the revelation of some important plot details 
from book 6.

====
.
.
.
.
.
.

Severus Snape: 
The Unlikely Hero of Harry Potter book 7
 

By Dave Kopel            

 

July 19, 2005

 

Don't read the rest of this article unless you've finished Harry 
Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. The predictions for book 7 will 
necessarily involve the revelation of some important plot details 
from book 6.

 

One of the many virtues of John Granger's book The Hidden Key to 
Harry Potter is its emphasis on the importance of characters' names. 
In a National Review Online review a couple years ago, I noted 
Granger's interesting and plausible theories of the Christian subtext 
in the names "Gryffindor" and "Harry Potter." Other character names 
also have interesting Christian roots. For example. Harry's devoted 
and protective owl Hedwig shares a name with a medieval Christian 
saint, who is the patroness of the Sisters of St. Hedwig, a small 
charitable order whose "chief aim is the education of orphaned and 
abandoned children." A Potter fan website contains a compendium of 
many character names and their meanings (up through volume 4), and 
the site, while full of fascinating information, does not exhaust the 
meanings that can be drawn from the names. 

 

Granger points out that the sibilance of "Severus Snape" makes the 
reader think of a snake, and the crafty, mistrustful Snape has many 
snake-like qualities. Also, Severus is an unusually severe teacher. 
However, I think there is a more significant meaning of the name, 
which perhaps holds the key to the dénouement of the forthcoming book 
7.  "Severus" is a variant of "sever"—to cut. If run the two words of 
his name together, so that the consonants link up, then we 
hear "sever-uh-ssnape," very much like "sever a snake."

 

In the end, I predict, Snape will sacrifice himself in order to 
destroy the snakelike Voldemort, whose personal symbol (the Dark 
Mark) is a snake tongue projecting from a death's head skull. (The 
symbol unintentionally teaches the lesson that false speech is a form 
of death).At a surface level, the events of the just-published book 6 
seem entirely contrary to my thesis, but looked at from another 
angle, they confirm it. Let's begin with chapter 2, "Spinner's End," 
in which Snape makes the Unbreakable Vow to Narcissa Malfoy. The 
chapter's title ostensibly refers to the street where Snape lives.

 

 But the chapter is also the beginning of the end of Snape's life of 
deceptions and double games, of trying to play both sides of the 
street. As he explains to Narcissa and Bellatrix, he once "spun" an 
elaborate "tale of deepest remorse" in order to gain Dumbledore's 
protection. (Page 31).When Narcissa asks him for the Unbreakable Vow, 
Bellatrix sneers that Snape will offer only "The usual empty words, 
the usual slithering out of action…" (35). But, perhaps for the first 
time in his life, Snape surrenders himself for another. The 
consequence of breaking an Unbreakable Vow is death.

 

Marriage is, in its sanctified state, an unbreakable vow, and the 
enchantment ceremony is remarkably like a wedding: Snape looks into 
Narcissa's tearful eyes, kneels before her, and they clasp hands. In 
the presence of a Bonder, Snape is asked questions which evoke the 
rhythm of the wedding vows: "Will you, Severus, watch over my son…" 
To each question, Snape responds, "I will"—reminiscent of the "I do" 
of the unbreakable vows in a wedding. 

 

With each "I will," a tongue of flame coils around their intertwined 
hands. (36-37). Snape loves Narcissa, I suggest. His beloved is a 
narcissist, but at the greatest crisis of her life—when her son is 
mortal peril, and her husband is unable to protect their son, 
Narcissa risks everything—even betraying the Dark Lord and incurring 
his terrible wrath—in a desperate attempt to save her Draco. (32).

 

Because Narcissa and Snape love, they ultimately, not true servants 
of the Dark Lord.

 

Months later, Hagrid tells Harry about a recently overheard argument 
between Dumbledore and Snape: "I jus' heard Snape sayin' Dumbledore 
took too much for granted an' maybe he—Snape—didn' wan' ter do it 
anymore…Dumbledore told him out he'd agreed to do it an' that was all 
there was to it." (405-06).

 

In the climactic confrontation between Dumbledore and Draco, on the 
Astronomy Tower, Dumbledore reveals that he has known all along about 
Malfoy's plot to murder him. Yet Dumbledore has not acted against 
Draco, because Dumbledore still hopes to save him  by making Draco 
prove to himself that he is not a killer, and thereby enticing Malfoy 
to come over the Right side. (585, 591-92).

 

The one person who knows that the Dark Lord has ordered Malfoy to 
attempt to kill Dumbledore and is a person who has any contact with 
Dumbledore is Severus Snape. I believe that Snape  revealed the Dark 
Lord's plot to Dumbledore. And that Snape also revealed to Dumbledore 
that Snape had made an Unbreakable Vow to Narcissa. The argument 
between Dumbledore and Snape had occurred when Snape grew weary in 
his efforts to protect Draco, and Dumbledore insisted that Snape must 
keep his vow.

 

Dumbledore's knowledge of the third part of Snape's vow—to kill 
Dumbledore if Malfoy could not—explains what happened shortly before 
Dumbledore's death. Dumbledore wanted to die (I'll explain why in a 
little bit), and he knew that Snape was the man who could—and must—
perform the deed.

 

Consider the ambiguity of Dumbledore's words as Harry and he rush 
back to Hogwarts: "It is professor Snape whom I need." (580). This 
time, Dumbledore is not looking for Snape to heal him, as Snape had 
done the previous summer, when Dumbledore had returned badly injured 
from a fierce battle.

 

When Snape arrives at the Astronomy Tower, he first surveys the 
scene, but takes no action. Dumbledore is defenseless. But Draco is 
unable to bring himself to kill Dumbledore. The other Death Eaters on 
the Tower would be happy to kill Dumbledore, but they are afraid to 
act, because the Dark Lord has ordered that Draco must be the one to 
dispatch Dumbledore. As Dumbledore knows, only Snape—who has made the 
Unbreakable Vow to kill Dumbledore if Draco cannot—will defy the Dark 
Lord's orders, and personally kill Dumbledore.

 

It is then that Dumbledore begs Snape to fulfill his vow: "Severus," 
says the headmaster. "For the first time, Dumbledore was pleading." 
(595). "Severus…please…"

 

If Snape were following Dumbledore's wishes, why were "revulsion and 
hatred etched" in Snape's face as a gazed at Dumbledore just before 
killing him? Firstly, revulsion at having to perform an Unforgivable 
Curse, the death spell Avada Kedavra. Discussing the killing 
afterwards, the Hogwarts teachers and pupils agree that they had 
never believed that Snape, for all his faults, could kill a man. To 
fulfill the Unbreakable Vow and Dumbledore's wishes, Snape had act in 
revolt against his true nature.

 

As for the "hatred", Snape knows that a wizard must act with hatred 
in order to successfully cast an Unforgivable Curse. Hatred comes 
easily to Snape, and he had all sorts of  resentments which he could 
bring to mind—including, perhaps, hatred of Dumbledore for making 
Harry Potter into the headmaster's favorite. And then there is a full 
reservoir of self-hatred from his miserable childhood, compounded by 
his many cruelties as an adult.

 

But my guess is that the primary source of the "revulsion and hatred" 
is that Snape knows the same things that Dumbledore had learned just 
a few minutes before, when Dumbledore drank the magic potion--from 
the basin in the secret lake where Voldemort had hidden a Horcrux.  
(Note the meaning of "whore/horrible cross"—a perverted version of 
the soul-saving object which overcomes death.)

 

Dumbledore suffered agony while drinking the ten goblets of potion. 
Harry presumed that Dumbledore was simply hallucinating while he 
drank, but I believe that Dumbledore instead was seeing some terrible 
truths.

 

Harry saw Dumbledore become frightened. He moaned "…don't like…want 
to stop…I don't want to…Let me go… Make it stop, make it stop." (The 
last phrase echoes the frightened scream "make it stop" of the girl 
Regan, who is possessed by a demon in The Exorcist.) Dumbledore 
continued, "I can't, don't make me, I don't want to…"

 

Then, "It's all my fault, all my fault…I know I did wrong, oh please 
make it stop and I'll never, never again…Don't hurt them…it's my 
fault, hurt me instead…" (The last phrase echoes what the young 
exorcizing priest Father Karras yelled at the demon: "Take me"  The 
demon immediately left the girl's body, and inhabited the Karras, who 
immediately  hurled himself out the window to his death—thereby 
thwarting the demon; he survived just long enough to receive last 
rites, and die peacefully.)

 

Dumbledore implored "Make it stop, make it stop, I want to die!"   

 

Then, as just before Harry gave Dumbledore the tenth and final 
goblet, Dumbledore yelled "Kill me!" "`This—this one will!' gasped 
Harry." (573).

 

Dumbledore, I believe, realized that he had made a terrible mistake 
which had empowered Voldemort, and that only by dying could 
Dumbledore stop the harm from that mistake. As Dumbledore had told 
Harry long before, "I make mistakes like the next man. In fact, being—
forgive me—rather cleverer than most men, my mistakes tend to be 
correspondingly huger." (197).

 

What was the mistake? It likely has something to do with the meeting 
that Voldemort arranged years ago with Dumbledore, ostensibly to 
apply for a professorship at Hogwarts. Dumbledore was baffled by the 
meeting, since Voldemort (a/k/a Tom Riddle) plainly knew that there 
was no chance that Dumbledore would hire him, and Dumbledore knew 
that Riddle knew.

 

Yet Dumbledore let Riddle into Dumbledore's own office. Watching a 
replay of the meeting in Dumbledore's Pensieve, Harry notices 
something at the very end of the meeting, which Dumbledore, it seems, 
did not: "For a second, Harry was on the verge of shouting a 
pointless warning: He was sure that Voldemort's hand had twitched 
toward his pocket and his wand; but the moment had passed, Voldemort 
had turned away, the door was closing, and he was gone." (446).

 

Whatever malignant spell that Voldemort secretly cast on that day—
enchanting something in Dumbledore's own office, or even Dumbledore 
himself--had consequences which Dumbledore only realized when he 
drank the potion on the island. The spell may have involved inserting 
into Hogwarts (in a deep magical disguise) the four followers of 
Voldemort who were waiting gathered in the town outside Hogwarts. As 
Dumbledore told Riddle during the interview, it made no sense for 
Riddle to have been accompanied by the four, if Riddle only wanted to 
speak with Dumbledore.

 

In any case, Dumbledore understood, for reasons that are still 
unclear to us, that he had to die soon in order to save innocents.

 

Snape's final scene is consistent with the thesis that Snape is not a 
true servant of the Dark Lord.

 

Significantly, Snape protects Harry, in a sense. Snape's timely spell-
casting prevents Harry from uttering an Unforgivable Curse. Snape was 
not present in the showdown at the Ministry of Magic at the end of 
book 5, so he may not know that Harry has already cast an 
Unforgivable Curse. Bellatrix (meaning female warrior, and also the 
name of the bright star that is Orion's right shoulder) does know 
that Harry uttered an Unforgivable Curse, but—given her embarrassment 
at her own failure in the Ministry—may not have given Snape a blow-by-
blow account of every aspect of the battle.

 

In the showdown with Harry outside the school grounds, Snape's face 
is full of hatred, but it's understandable. Harry attempts to cast a 
spell on Snape which Snape, as a Hogwarts student, had invented 
himself. Harry's father, James Potter, had bullied his fellow student 
Snape by using a Snape-invented spell against Snape. (This is the 
Snape memory that Harry watched in Snape's Pensieve, in book 5.)  

 

If Snape has always been playing a complex double game against 
Voldemort (or at least working both sides of the street, and keeping 
his options open, to make sure he can jump to the winning side), why 
doesn't Voldemort know? After all, the Dark Lord is, as Snape says in 
chapter 2, "the most accomplished Legilimens the world has ever 
seen?" (Like many spells, Legilmens is just a Latin variant; in this 
case, for "read-mind.")

 

This answer is easy. Snape is a superb practitioner of Occlumency, 
which blocks an attempt to read one's mind. Remember that in book 5, 
Harry was ordered to take Occlumency lessons from Snape—with the 
expectation that if Potter learned well (he barely even tried), 
Potter would be able to prevent Voldemort from reading Harry's mind, 
despite the intense mental link between Harry and Voldemort. Indeed, 
Occlumency, in a metaphorical sense, is the essence of Snape's 
character. He is the man of the "unreadable" expression. (35). Ever 
since book 1, Rowling has been pulling surprises about Snape, so that 
readers never know for certain what are Snape's true intentions.

 

Consider the possibility that Snape may know the full prophecy. In 
book 5, Dumbledore explains to Harry how job applicant Sybil Trelawny 
entered a trance, which she does not remember, and uttered the 
prophecy one night shortly before Harry was born. (427) (Her first 
name comes from the Greek "Sibylla," meaning "prophetess." She shares 
a last name with Edward John Trelawny, a 19th century English "self-
promoting…brilliant story-teller…[who]…was far from truthful." 
Professor Trelawny is mostly a self-promoting fraud, but she does get 
things right sometimes, as in book 6, when the cards keep sending 
message of impending doom on a tower.)

 

Trelawny tells Harry that her job interview with Dumbledore was 
interrupted by the discovery that Snape was eavesdropping. (545). 
Dumbledore  presumes that Snape only told Voldemort the first half of 
the prophecy. (549) (The first part identifies a baby born July 31—
either Harry Potter or Neville Longbottom—as a dangerous foe of 
Voldemort.) Dumbledore's presumption is accurate, since Voldemort 
clearly does not know the second half of the prophecy, and spent all 
of book 5 in a futile effort to learn it. And Snape plainly told 
Voldemort the first half of the prophecy, since Voldemort then began 
planning to kill baby Harry, although he succeeded only in killing 
Harry's parents.

 

Accordingly, Dumbledore and Harry presume that Snape does not know 
the second half of the prophecy, because they assume that Snape, who 
at the time was a Death Eater, would have told Voldemort everything 
that Snape knew. But maybe Dumbledore and Harry are wrong in their 
presumption. Perhaps Snape was playing a double game even then, and 
decided to retain some options for himself by keeping the second half 
of the prophecy to himself. Especially because the prophecy suggests 
that Voldemort's side might not be the winning side in the long run.

 

The first half of the prophecy is: 


"The one with the power to vanquish the Dark Lord approaches. born to 
those who have thrice defied him, born as the seventh month dies . 
and the Dark Lord will mark him as his equal, but he will have power 
the Dark Lord knows not"
The second half of the prophecy explains, I suggest, why Harry must 
die in book 7, so that Voldemort can be destroyed:

and either must die at the hand of the other for neither can live 
while the other survives . the one with the power to vanquish the 
Dark Lord will be born as the seventh month dies.

"[N]either can live while the other survives." On the face of it, the 
statement is absurd. Voldemort and Harry are both alive, and both 
survive, simultaneously. We tend to think of "live" and "survive" as 
synonyms. Yet if the two words are synonyms, the prophecy is 
incorrect. 

 

It could be argued, if a person is not mortal, he is in a sense not 
truly living. The immortal creatures (that is, creatures which 
survive endlessly) which we have seen are ghosts and inferni. Each of 
them survives, yet neither of them lives.

 

Thus, as long as Harry survives, Voldemort is not mortal. 
Accordingly, Voldemort is, in a sense, not living. And perhaps, in 
some as-yet unknown way, Harry is immortal as long as Voldemort 
survives.

 

Referring to Godric Gryffindor's sword, Dumbledore states, "the only 
known relic of Gryffindor remains safe" from Voldemort's attempt to 
implant a Horcrux. (505) Yes, but could there be an unknown relic of 
the co-founder of Hogwarts? Such as the last living descendant of 
Godric Gryffindor (just as Voldemort, the Heir of Slytherin, is the 
last descendant of Salazar Slytherin)?

 

Harry was born in Godric Hollow. There are numerous reasons, detailed 
in the book by John Granger, to believe that Harry  is the Heir of 
Gryffindor. His name even sounds like "heir" when Fleur Delacour call 
him 'Arry with her French accent.

 

The reason that Harry must die in order that Voldemort may "live" (as 
a mortal) rather than "survive" (as a deathless immortal) is that the 
final Horcrux is contained within Harry himself.

 

At the very end of book 6, Harry announces his plans to return 
briefly to the Dursleys (pursuant to Dumbledore's previous 
instructions), and then to go for the first time in his life to 
Godric Hollow, the home of his infancy, before setting out on a quest 
for the Horcruxes. (630-31). The journey to the home where his 
parents were murdered will be even more significant to his quest than 
Harry currently realizes.

 

By returning in the summer of his 16th year to the unhappy home where 
he was raised, and thereafter to the place where he was born, Harry 
will recapitulate what Tom Riddle did in the summer of his own 16th 
year. (363).

 

"I am sure he was intending to make his final Horcrux with your 
death," Dumbledore explained to Harry. (506).

 

But Voldemort's death/Horcrux spell on baby Harry went terribly 
wrong, and blasted Voldemort's body out of existence. Yet maybe 
Voldemort did, unbeknownst to himself, create that final Horcrux: in 
Harry Potter himself. The lightning bolt scar on Harry's forehead is 
clearly more than a wound from the attack, since we know it magically 
links Harry and Voldemort. Could it also be the final Horcrux?  And 
so for Voldemort to be destroyed with finality, Harry himself must 
die too.

 

Perhaps there's some way to destroy only the Horcrux, without killing 
Harry. But from what we've seen so far, in order to destroy a 
Horcrux, such as the one contained in Tom Riddle's diary, one must 
destroy the Horcrux-carrier too. (The Letters of Marque blog by 
Michigan Law student Heidi Bond contains an extensive discussion of 
the "Harry has a Horcrux" theory.)

 

One final mystery: who is the "R.A.B." who had already swiped the 
Horcrux from the basin on the island on Lake Voldemort, long before 
Dumbledore and Harry arrived to attempt to take the Horcrux? As 
Hermione's archival research shows, there is no plausible Horcrux-
swiper with the initials "R.A.B." (We don't know the middle initial 
of Regulus Black, the deceased younger brother of Harry's godfather. 
But I presume that Hermione is such a thorough researcher that she 
would not have failed to discover the middle initial of such an 
obvious suspect.)

 

Remember Dumbledore's words to Harry, as the two of them successfully 
returned from their journey through Voldemort's lake in the 
cave: "One alone could not have done it…" (577).

 

So "R.A.B." might be the initials for a team of three wizards who 
took the Horcrux locket. Yet the enchanted boat which is necessary to 
cross from the shore to the island can detect magic, and will only 
allow a single adult wizard passenger. The boat does not prevent 
Harry from riding with Dumbledore because Harry is still underage, 
and thus his powers apparently do not "register" with the boat's 
passenger detectors. (564). If so, it would seem impossible that 
three adult wizards could have ridden the boat. Were at least two of 
the "R.A.B" trio underage? Or did they just bring brooms so they 
could fly?

 

Moreover, whoever took the Horcrux would have needed to first empty 
the basin by drinking all its potion. So how did the basin get 
refilled with potion by the time Harry and Dumbledore arrived?

 

Here's my theory: R.A.B. refers, in whole or in part, to Severus 
Snape. When Hermione reports on her archival research about wizards 
with the initials R.A.B., none of whom seem plausibly to be the 
Horcrux-taker, she concludes, "No, actually, it's about…well, Snape." 
(636). What she means is that while looking up "R.A.B.," she ran 
across a small newspaper article revealing that Snape's mother had 
the maiden name "Prince" and she married a muggle; Hermione has 
discovered why Severus Snape called himself "The Half-blood Prince." 
(636-37). But perhaps Hermione has said more than she knows when she 
says that "R.A.B." is about Snape.

 

As a potions genius, Snape might have known a way to neutralize the 
potion while consuming it. He likewise might have known how to re-
fill the basin with fresh potion, after he had emptied it, and taken 
the Horcrux.

 

I believe that Harry is correct in his prediction, "if I meet Severus 
Snape along the way, so much the better for me, so much the worse for 
him." (651) But how things work out between Snape and Harry will be 
immensely more complex than Harry now understands.

 

I searched the web for "R.A.B." plus "legends." What I found was the 
Croatian Island of Rab and the story of its patron saint, as told in 
the Golden Legend. Written by Jacobus de Vorgaigne, the Golden Legend 
is a 15th-century collection of biographies of saints and other pious 
stories. In its heyday, it was published in every major European 
language, and was second only to the Bible in popularity. The best-
seller offered fascinating stories of magic—in the form of miraculous 
relics—which reinforced Christian faith.

 

Here is the story of Rab's patron:

 

Once there was a Canaanite named Reprobus, a huge man of  "right 
great stature" who bore "a terrible and fearful" countenance. He 
decided "that he would seek the greatest prince that was in the 
world, and him would he serve and obey." So first Reprobus served the 
most powerful king in the world. But then he learned that the king 
was afraid of the devil. So Reprobus left the king and went to find 
the devil. Upon meeting him, Reprobus "took him for his master and 
Lord." Later, Reprobus discovered that the devil was afraid of Christ.

 

So Reprobus left the devil, and asked a hermit to tell him how to 
serve Christ. The hermit ordered him to use his great strength to 
carry travelers across a nearby river. One day, he was carrying a 
child, "And the water of the river arose and swelled more and more: 
and the child was heavy as lead… And when he was escaped with great 
pain, and passed the water, and set the child aground, he said to the 
child: Child, thou hast put me in great peril; thou weighest almost 
as I had all the world upon me, I might bear no greater burden." The 
passenger revealed himself as the Christ-child, and gave Reprobus a 
staff which could perform miracles.
 

The name of Reprobus  ("wicked person") was changed to Christopher 
("Christ-bearer"), the first usage of that name. Christopher and his 
staff performed many miracles, converted thousands of souls, and, in 
facing martyrdom bravely, converted still more. 

 

I doubt that J.K. Rowling plans to work the Golden Legend directly 
into volume 7, but—given her extremely broad knowledge of literature 
and of the inspiring myths and legends of Europe—it is almost 
impossible that she doesn't know the Golden Legend.

 

In any case, I expect that the final volume of the Harry Potter 
series will complete the story of Severus Snape as a wicked man who 
first served ordinary power, then Evil incarnate, and finally—by 
courageously risking his own life and using his enormous talents—will 
come face-to-face with the Right, as he is liberated from the burden 
of his own sins, and liberates many other sinners as well.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
  
More by Kopel on Potter: 

 

<a href="http://www.reason.com/hod/dk060404.shtml";>A Dementor 
Short</a>. Mugglewear Casual mars Harry hat trick. Reason Online. 
June 4, 2004. Review of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 
movie. 

 <a href="http://www.davekopel.com/NRO/2003/Deconstructing-
Rowling.htm">Deconstructing Rowling. National Review Onlin</a>e. June 
20, 2003. Review of The Hidden Key to Harry Potter, which 
convincingly explicates the work as a series of Christian fiction, in 
the tradition of Tolkein and Lewis.
 
<a href="http://www.davekopel.com/Media/RMN/2001/RUMORS-%20QUASH%
20ONE,%20FUEL%20ONE.htm">Rumors: Quash one, fuel one</a>. While 
debunking Harry Potter author's Satanist 'quotes,' News promotes 
drug's 'role' in deaths. Rocky Mountain News/Denver Post. Dec. 2, 
2001. 

<a 
href="http://www.davekopel.com/NRO/2000/Mugglemania.htm";>Mugglemania.<
/a> Harry Potter is the ur-libertarian who just might save 
civilization. National Review Online. July 22-23, 2000. 
 






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<font face=arial size=-1><a 
href="http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=12hch60ff/M=323294.6903899.7846637.3022212/D=groups/S=1705136382:TM/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1124134855/A=2896129/R=0/SIG=11llkm9tk/*http://www.donorschoose.org/index.php?lc=yahooemail";>DonorsChoose.
 A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources often lacking in 
public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today</a>!</font>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Milis Penggemar Harry Potter Indonesia
-----------------------------------------------------------
*AWAS HOWLER! ketika me-reply,hapus tulisan yg tak perlu.
*AVADA KEDAVRA!!! jgn mengirim diluar topik Harry Potter
*Mau keluar dari milis ini? Merasa diri kamu Muggle?
email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Minta bantuan moderator? Masukan untuk moderator?
email ke: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Milis Indo-HarryPotter
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/indo-harrypotter
*Blog Milis Indo-HarryPotter:
http://indoharrypotter.blogspot.com
*Situs Penggemar Harry Potter Indonesia:
http://www.harrypotterindonesia.com
*FanFiction Harry Potter Indonesia:
http://www.geocities.com/hogwarts_chronicles
*Friendster Milis Indo-harrypotter:
http://www.friendster.com/useropen.php?uid=7233008
add fs : annelumos AT post DOT com
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ikuti event milis bulan ini:
*Tes OWL dari buku HP6: baca bukunya, paham isinya!
*Hogwarts Idol: dukung idolamu!
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Harry Potter and The Half-Blood Prince"
SPOILER ALERT berlaku sampai 31 Agustus 2005!!!
1 Sep 2005, mulai masuk Hogwarts lg, diskusi HP6 bebas
*Foto-foto Launching HP 6 di QB Pondok Indah 16 Juli 2005
http://www.gui-production.com/saradani/qbhp/
-----------------------------------------------------------
"Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire"
Coming Soon. On Cinema. November 2005.
=========================================================== 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/indo-harrypotter/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke