in short .... cape' dehh.. :)
--- In [email protected], ERI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have. over and over again...
> Maybe you just did not notice it.
> And it was not my opinion. It was from the books.
>
> my boson-graviton explanation did not get you?
> oh well....
>
> ---------------
>
> Hawking has been trying to combine classical Law of Physics (Newton,
> Einstein, etc) with Quantum Physics.
> Has he succeeded? not yet. Why? because of the gravitation/gravity.
>
> So... even Hawking is still having problem with the graviton and
> gravitation, .... the most mysterious force in the universe...
> so who am I trying to explain that clearly to anybody?
>
>
> Salam,
> Eri.
>
>
> warbird692001 wrote:
> >
> > Why not?
> >
> > If it could make you stand on your opinion, why stop?
> > If it could you help you give the definition of both gravity and
> > gravitation to help us understand your point of view?
> > My friend has given his definitions, you have not.
> >
> > According to Eri:
> >
> > Gravity = ...
> > Gravitation = ...
> >
> > Gitu loh.
> >
> > Salam,
> > Indie
> >
> > --- In [email protected]
> > <mailto:indo-startrek%40yahoogroups.com>, ERI <erianto.rachman@>
wrote:
> >
> > > I don't need to explain the rest 5 books of Quantum Physics that
I have
> > > read more than once.
> >
> >
>
