Thank you Victor, Very clear, particularly where you wrote: . . . . . .
> Outside of the Sanskrit tradition people have wrongly stated that this > bahuvrīhi [ jitakāmaḥ] is therefore "based" on the karmadhāraya. I say > "wrongly" because no such compound ever existed nor indeed would one expect > to find jitakāmaḥ as a karmadhāraya compound meaning "conquered Kāmadeva". > . . . . . . > Again, there was never any tatpuruṣa cakrapāṇiḥ meaning "the discus in the > hand" so it doesn't really make sense to speak of a bahuvrīhi based on the > tatpuruṣa. > . . . . . . Harry Spier
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
