In Nāgarī manuscripts, copyists mark off the curved upper part of the incorrect vowel with two marks and add a short mark at the bottom of the vertical stroke. See the third line of the attached image. My guess is that the correction practice in Newari manuscripts is similar. The dot may be an accidental mark (a drop of ink).
You can review images of three Newari script manuscripts at the OCHS Manuscript Database Project (https://ochs-database.netlify.app/) to look for corrections of I to ī or ī to i.  Best wishes, Elliot > On May 16, 2026, at 9:50 AM, Дмитрий Комиссаров via INDOLOGY > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear list members, > Could you please help me interpret a sign in a manuscript written in the > Newari script. > The scribe made a mistake and for the akṣara "ccha" wrote two vowel > diacritics — i and ī. Under the ī diacritic, he placed some kind of dot (see > the picture; sorry for the poor image quality). Could this dot mean that of > the two diacritics, the one under which the dot is placed should be > considered the correct one? > I would be grateful for any hints you can give me. > Best regards, > Dmitrii Komissarov > > <dot.jpg> > > _______________________________________________ > INDOLOGY mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology Elliot M. Stern 552 South 48th Street Philadelphia, PA 19143-2029 [email protected] 267-240-8418
_______________________________________________ INDOLOGY mailing list [email protected] https://list.indology.info/mailman/listinfo/indology
