On 3/18/11 2:19 PM, david marion wrote: > > Bela, Manik, > > Thanks for responding. Will ISPN-83 be included in 4.2.1.FINAL? Yes, a > large cluster jgroups config would be great. At this point we have taken the > UDP config distributed with 4.2.0 and increased all the timeouts.
That's certainly not the way to do it ! If you post your config over on the JGroups mailing list [1], I'll take a look and suggest modifications. If we work on this a bit to get your cluster going, this config could serve as the basis of a large cluster sample config, shipped with JGroups and posted on a wiki. > It took about 30 minutes to get to 150 nodes. The cluster appears stable once > its up, the problem is in the startup. Based on what I am seeing and have > read in the >documentation, every time a node wants to join a FLUSH is sent across the entire system and then a new view is created. FLUSH can not be part of a large cluster configuration; virtual synchrony was never meant to scale to more than 20 or so nodes ! > We are seeing nodes wait minutes to get the new view. It has been mentioned > before that Infinispan was tested at 1000 nodes Where was this mentioned ? I personally have never see such a large cluster... The largest cluster I know of is ca 400 nodes... [1] https://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/javagroups-users -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups / Clustering Team JBoss _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
