Initially yes, but I think we are getting better stability using TCP. I 
switched it back to TCP yesterday. I can post specifics of what I did in the 
TCP configuration, but the short story is I increased a lot of the timeout 
values to get it to work.
 
Dave Marion

 
> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:50:54 +0100
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Infinispan Large Scale support
> 
> 
> 
> On 3/18/11 10:35 PM, Dave wrote:
> > Won't be able to get CR4 uploaded, policy dictates that I wait until final
> > release. However, I was able to get 431 nodes up and running as a replicated
> > cluster and 115 nodes up as a distributed cluster. For the 430 node cache, I
> > was able to get it started with no problems about 50% of the time. When they
> > formed multiple clusters they merged together only some of the time. It
> > really does appear to be a startup issue at this point. We have not pushed
> > it hard enough yet to see what happens at this scale under load.
> >
> >
> >
> > Any idea when CR4 will be FINAL?
> >
> > Are there any tools to help diagnose problems / performance at this scale (I
> > ended up writing my own monitor program)?
> 
> 
> Yes, there's probe.sh at the JGroups level. I created a JIRA to provide 
> a sample for large clusters. You said you based your config on udp.xml, 
> correct ?
> 
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JGRP-1307
> 
> -- 
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
> JBoss
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
                                          
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to