Thanks Sebastiano, Would it be possible to issue a pull request with the current code? The two points you mentioned can be added at a further point in time. I'm asking this because I expect other changes to happen on top your TPC-C.
Thanks! Mircea On 10 Nov 2011, at 18:04, Sebastiano Peluso wrote: > Hi Mircea, > > thank you. > > Before issuing a pull request I want to make two modifications in the code: > > 1) implementing Externalizable interface for the TPC-C domain objects (as > suggested by Galder Zamarreño); > > 2) changing load/store methods of TPC-C domain classes in order to treat > domain objects as immutable objects. In fact, I have noticed that we can have > objects sharing among threads belonging to the same node. > > Unfortunately I cannot make these modifications before the end of the next > week because I'm trying to finalize works for a close deadline. > > Nevertheless I think that you can already use the code for benchmarking > because the aforementioned "objects sharing" problem affects only the > application semantics (and it doesn't affect cache performances) while > Externalizable interfaces only make a test run faster. > > Let me know if this is ok for you. > > > Cheers, > > Sebastiano > > > Il 10/11/11 01:54, Mircea Markus ha scritto: >> >> >> On 7 Nov 2011, at 16:22, Sebastiano Peluso wrote: >> >>> Il 07/11/11 15:05, Galder Zamarreño ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Thx Sebastiano. Would you mind issuing a pull request for your tpcc branch >>>> so that we can integrate it into Radargun? >>> Yes of course. >>>> >> Hi Sebastiano, >> if you need any help on this please let me know - my transactional >> improvements are almost finished/currently being reviewed, so I'm really >> keen to play with TPCC :-) >> >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
