On 14 Dec 2011, at 13:55, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >>> >>> Yeah it's pointless to use locks if you have a single operation, but I >>> might want to do more operations in a single transaction.. actually >>> what's the point of using a transaction if I have only one operation? >> WIthout transaction it is possible that the operation is only partially >> applied, i.e. on a subset of numOwners, resulting in inconsistent state. > > Good point Mircea. You should definitely document that cos that's pretty much > the sole reason to use implicit transactions, something users should know.
Yes, please make sure this makes it onto Confluence. -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
