On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:05, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 26 January 2012 10:36, Manik Surtani <ma...@jboss.org> wrote: >> Dan, >> >> Looking through what we currently have, given the blocking nature of state >> transfer, I wonder if we can improve on it by pausing the state transfer >> from time to time to flush waiting transactions? I.e., if state transfer is >> in progress and a write command or transaction is waiting for it to finish, >> and since state transfer is chunked anyway, perhaps to let a few >> transactions through in between transferring chunks? > > Wondering about my proposal about transfering values separately from > locks not being easier to implement? Or likely same effort, but > better..
Well, thats what I want to try and understand. If periodic flushing is easier/quicker/less risky to implement, I think we could do it for 5.2.0. :) Sanne, have you documented your design on separate transfer of state vs locks on the wiki somewhere? I'd be curious to see what Paolo and the others at INESC and CINI think about it as well. :) Cheers Manik -- Manik Surtani ma...@jboss.org twitter.com/maniksurtani Lead, Infinispan http://www.infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
