On Oct 19, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Vladimir Blagojevic <vblag...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Cool! Did not know about this! Is this original idea or others are already > doing this? As spotted via Lord Profiler: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/attachment/12357778/Screen%20Shot%202012-10-17%20at%201.21.48%20PM.png > On 12-10-19 8:31 AM, Galder Zamarreño wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Re: >> https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/0609207d13216de81d77ff51dc20652ce270c635 >> >> Please avoid using these JDK methods where possible. I've created >> alternative versions in InfinispanCollections util class that provide a >> better implementation. >> >> The problem with the JDK versions is that even if these collections are >> immutable, if you wanna iterate them (i.e. for(X : emptySet) ), they'll >> create a brand new Iterator every time they're looped, and that generates >> useless garbage. >> >> The InfinispanCollections versions of emptyX will return a constant >> singleton iterator which avoids this problem, and avoids the need for client >> code to check if the collection is empty before looping. >> >> Cheers, >> -- >> Galder Zamarreño >> gal...@redhat.com >> twitter.com/galderz >> >> Project Lead, Escalante >> http://escalante.io >> >> Engineer, Infinispan >> http://infinispan.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> infinispan-dev mailing list >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > -- Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
