Hi Bela, Do you think we can have this particular improvement in JGroups by 18 Feb? That week Pedro, Dan and I are going to start integrating TO protocols in ISPN and this is a requirement for it.
On 8 Feb 2013, at 12:41, Pedro Ruivo wrote: > On 2/8/13 12:26 PM, Mircea Markus wrote: >> >> >> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:36, Manik Surtani wrote: >> >>> On 7 Feb 2013, at 11:29, Bela Ban <b...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I meant to say that this is up to you guys to decide inwhich Infinispan >>>> release this will be used, but it will be available in JGroups 3.3. >>>> >>>> What's the strategy/schedule for 6 and 5.3 anyway ? >>> >>> 5.3 will be relatively quick, just an incremental release mainly targeting >>> reviewing and putting in a few contribs on the queue. E.g., we're hoping >>> for 5.3 to be feature-complete in no more than 2 months. >>> >>> 6 is where we get to break API - specifically with the new packaging, etc. >>> >>> But this seems like a pretty important feature/fix so it may make sense to >>> get this into 5.3. >> >> Pedro - please correct me if I'm wrong. >> This feature (or the alternative Pedro has already implemented in his >> branch) is used be the TO code that we'll integrate in 5.3. Se in order to >> have TO in ISPN we need these jgroups improvements in. > yes, I'll need it. otherwise, I have to create another RpcCommand to send > back the response generated by the other thread >> Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org)
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
