Ouch, call me dumbass... I haven't checked the test results. Something revoked 
my cluster allocation and the test was prematurely stopped.

I'll rerun it (and check!), and show performance numbers as well.

Radim (the dumbass)

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Dan Berindei" <[email protected]>
| To: "infinispan -Dev List" <[email protected]>
| Cc: "Manik Surtani" <[email protected]>
| Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:24:46 PM
| Subject: Re: [infinispan-dev] Staggering remote GET calls
|  
| 
| Radim, just to be sure, you are testing embedded mode with RadarGun,
| right? With HotRod most of the get operations should be initiated
| from the main owner, so Manik's changes shouldn't make a big
| difference in the number of active threads.
| 
| How about throughput, has it also improved compared to 5.2.0.CR3, or
| is it the same?
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Radim Vansa < [email protected] >
| wrote:
| 
| 
| Hi Manik,
| 
| so I have tried to compile this branch and issued a 20 minute stress
| test (preceded by 10 minute warmup) on 128 nodes, where each node
| has 10 stressor threads.
| While in 5.2.0.CR3 the maximum OOB threadpool size was 553 with this
| configuration, with t_825 it was 219. This looks good, but it's
| actually better :). When I looked on the per-node maximum, in t_825
| there was only one node with the 219 threads (as the max), others
| were usually around 25, few around 40. On the contrary, in 5.2.0.CR3
| all the nodes had maximum around 500!
| 
| Glad to bring good news :)
| 
| Radim
| 
| 
| 
| ----- Original Message -----
| | From: "Manik Surtani" < [email protected] >
| | To: "infinispan -Dev List" < [email protected] >,
| | "Radim Vansa" < [email protected] >
| | Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:33:04 PM
| | Subject: Staggering remote GET calls
| | 
| | Guys,
| | 
| | I have a topic branch with a fix for ISPN-825, to stagger remote
| | GET
| | calls. (See the JIRA for details on this patch).
| | 
| | This should have an interesting effect on greatly reducing the
| | pressure on the OOB thread pool. This isn't a *real* fix for the
| | problem that Radim reported (Pedro is working on that with Bela),
| | but reducing pressure on the OOB thread pool is a side effect of
| | this fix.
| | 
| | It should generally make things faster too, with less traffic on
| | the
| | network. I'd be curious for you to give this branch a try, Radim -
| | see how it impacts your tests.
| | 
| | https://github.com/maniksurtani/infinispan/tree/t_825
| | 
| | Cheers
| | Manik
| | --
| | Manik Surtani
| | [email protected]
| | twitter.com/maniksurtani
| | 
| | Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
| | http://red.ht/data-grid
| | 
| | 
| _______________________________________________
| infinispan-dev mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
| 
| 
| _______________________________________________
| infinispan-dev mailing list
| [email protected]
| https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to