On 28 Feb 2013, at 17:30, Pedro Ruivo wrote: >>>> chain the better. >>> So do you think that is better to create a new interceptor to dispatch >>> the commands to the thread pool? (at least for the VisitableCommands). >>> And put this new interceptor after the InvocationContextInterceptor? >> we shouldn't create an interceptor yet, perhaps we'll do that with ISPN-2849. >>> >>> My opinion, it to dispatch the command to a new thread before invoking >>> command.perform() in order to avoid to move some ThreadLocal variable, >>> set by the perform() method. >> +1 > However I prefer to do this dispatch in CARD to avoid make to code more > complex and duplicate it. I mean, in CARD we have: > > handle() { > if is from another site > process from another site > else > if is cache rpc command > inboundInvocationHandler.handle > else > command.perform > } > > and if I move the dispatch inside the InbounInvocationHandler, as > suggested, I will have to duplicate the code for each branch of the IF, > namelly: > > try > command.perform > transport.sendResponse > catch Thowable t > transport.sendResponse(ExceptionResponse) > If it's only for this try-catch duplication then it should be fine.
Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev