On Apr 8, 2013, at 12:56 PM, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On 8 April 2013 11:44, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:17 AM, Manik Surtani <msurt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> All sounds very good. One important thing to consider is that the 
> >> reference to Metadata passed in by the client app will be tied to the ICE 
> >> for the entire lifespan of the ICE.  You'll need to think about a 
> >> defensive copy or some other form of making the Metadata immutable (by the 
> >> user application, at least) the moment it is passed in.
> >
> > ^ Excellent point, it could be a nightmare if users could change the 
> > metadata reference by the ICE at will. I'll have a think on how to best 
> > achieve this.
> 
> ^ The metadata is gonna have to be marshalled somehow to ship to other nodes, 
> so that could be a way to achieve it, by enforcing this somehow. When the 
> cache receives it, it can marshaller/unmarshall it to make a copy
> 
> One way would be to make Metadata extend Serializable, but not keen on that. 
> Another would be to somehow force the interface to define the Externalizer to 
> use (i.e. an interface method like getExternalizer()), but that's akward when 
> it comes to unmarshalling… what about forcing the Metadata object to be 
> provided with a @SerializeWith annotation?
> 
> Why is getExternalizer() awkward for unmarshalling?

^ Because you don't have an instance yet, so what's the Externalizer for it? 
IOW, there's no much point to doing that, simply register it depending on your 
desire:
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Plugging+Infinispan+With+User+Defined+Externalizers

> I would expect you to have the marshaller already known during 
> deserialization.

You would, as long as you follow the instructions in 
https://docs.jboss.org/author/display/ISPN/Plugging+Infinispan+With+User+Defined+Externalizers

> Agreed that extensing Serializable is not a good idea.
> 
> Are you thinking about the impact on CacheStore(s) and state transfer?

^ What about it in particular?

> Eviction of no longer used metadata ?

^ Since the metadata is part of the entry, it'd initially go when the entry is 
evicted. We might wanna leave it around in some cases… but it'd be for other 
use cases.

I'm also considering separating the serialization/marshalling concerns from the 
defensive copying concerns. IOW, add a copy() method to the Metadata interface, 
or have a separate interface for those externally provided objects that require 
to be defensive copied. IOW, do something like what Scala Case Classes do with 
their copy() method, but without the issues of clone… I need to investigate 
this further to come up with a nice solution.

One positive side to splitting both concerns is speed. A Metadata 
implementation might have ways to make a copy of itself which are more 
efficient than marshalling/unmarshalling.

Thoughts?

> 
> Sanne
>  
> 
> Any other ideas?
> 
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >>
> >> On 8 Apr 2013, at 09:24, Galder Zamarreño <gal...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> As mentioned in 
> >>> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2013-March/012348.html, 
> >>> in paralell to the switch to Equivalent* collections, I was also working 
> >>> on being able to pass metadata into Infinispan caches. This is done to 
> >>> better support the ability to store custom metadata in Infinispan without 
> >>> the need of extra wrappers. So, the idea is that InternalCacheEntry 
> >>> instances will have a a reference to this Metadata.
> >>>
> >>> One of that metadata is version, which I've been using as test bed to see 
> >>> if clients could pass succesfully version information via metadata. As 
> >>> you already know, Hot Rod requires to store version information. Before, 
> >>> this was stored in a class called CacheValue alongside the value itself, 
> >>> but the work I've done in [1], this is passed via the new API I've added 
> >>> in [2].
> >>>
> >>> So, I'd like to get some thoughts on this new API. I hope that with these 
> >>> new put/replace versions, we can get rid of the nightmare which is all 
> >>> the other put/replace calls taking lifespan and/or maxIdle information. 
> >>> In the end, I think there should be two basic puts:
> >>>
> >>> - put(K, V)
> >>> - put(K, V, Metadata)
> >>>
> >>> And their equivalents.
> >>>
> >>> IMPORTANT NOTE 1: The implementation details are bound to change, because 
> >>> the entire Metadata needs to be stored in InternalCacheEntry, not just 
> >>> version, lifespan..etc. I'll further develop the implementation once I 
> >>> get into adding more metadata, i.e. when working on interoperability with 
> >>> REST. So, don't pay too much attention to the implementation itself, 
> >>> focus on the AdvancedCache API itself and let's refine that.
> >>>
> >>> IMPORTANT NOTE 2: The interoperability work in commit in [1] is WIP, so 
> >>> please let's avoid discussing it in this email thread. Once I have a more 
> >>> final version I'll send an email about it.
> >>>
> >>> Apart from working on enhancements to the API, I'm now carry on tackling 
> >>> the interoperability work with aim to have an initial version of the 
> >>> Embedded <-> Hot Rod interoperability as first step. Once that's in, it 
> >>> can be released to get early feedback while the rest of interoperability 
> >>> modes are developed.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> [1] 
> >>> https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/a35956fe291d2b2dc3b7fa7bf44d8965ffb1a54d
> >>> [2] 
> >>> https://github.com/galderz/infinispan/commit/a35956fe291d2b2dc3b7fa7bf44d8965ffb1a54d#L10R313
> >>> --
> >>> Galder Zamarreño
> >>> gal...@redhat.com
> >>> twitter.com/galderz
> >>>
> >>> Project Lead, Escalante
> >>> http://escalante.io
> >>>
> >>> Engineer, Infinispan
> >>> http://infinispan.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> infinispan-dev mailing list
> >>> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >>
> >> --
> >> Manik Surtani
> >> ma...@jboss.org
> >> twitter.com/maniksurtani
> >>
> >> Platform Architect, JBoss Data Grid
> >> http://red.ht/data-grid
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> infinispan-dev mailing list
> >> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> >
> >
> > --
> > Galder Zamarreño
> > gal...@redhat.com
> > twitter.com/galderz
> >
> > Project Lead, Escalante
> > http://escalante.io
> >
> > Engineer, Infinispan
> > http://infinispan.org
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Galder Zamarreño
> gal...@redhat.com
> twitter.com/galderz
> 
> Project Lead, Escalante
> http://escalante.io
> 
> Engineer, Infinispan
> http://infinispan.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


--
Galder Zamarreño
gal...@redhat.com
twitter.com/galderz

Project Lead, Escalante
http://escalante.io

Engineer, Infinispan
http://infinispan.org


_______________________________________________
infinispan-dev mailing list
infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev

Reply via email to