Very nice work Galder. Couple of questions re: Infinispan 5.3.0 ambitions/capabilities to provide JSR-107 transactions option.
1. We noticed on your GitHub branch that you have JCACHE Transactions test code. The code uses javax.transaction.TransactionManager (ajuna implementation). Will you extend this test to also audition the usage of javax.transaction.UserTransaction (arjuna, et. al. implementations?) and its JCACHE factory bridge via javax.cache.CacheManager.getUserTransaction() ? 2. We notice that your tests include specifying LOCAL isolation READ_COMMITTED. Will you extend this to build tests that actually challenge Inifispan's integrity for honoring the chosen isolation, i.e. by introducing specific "DIRTY_READ" (caching use case) test challenges? 3. Can we right now use Infinispan 5.3.0.A to build a test that demonstrates Infinispan (via its JTA bridge) honoring a REPEATABLE_READ isolation choice? 4. Can you comment on eventually providing tests that demonstrate Infinispan 5.3.0 using the TotalOrder (CloudTM?) JTA bridge to achieve SERIALIZABLE isolation choice? This one will be especially helpful, as we understand Infinispan has the ambition to supporting isolation=SERIALIZABLE via the JCACHE API. *We greatly applaud this ambition, and can't wait to see it working in Infinispan. * We don't know yet how directly dependent it is on TotalOrder being a capability provider (we're studying this). 5. Can you post any/all of your JUDcon JSR-107 presentation content? Again, very nice work ... we'll be following progress here closely. Thanks -Ben -- View this message in context: http://infinispan-developer-list.980875.n3.nabble.com/infinispan-dev-JCache-implementation-documentation-tp4026877p4026879.html Sent from the Infinispan Developer List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
