On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys > > CacheLoaderInterceptor and DistributionInterceptor both honour the > IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES flag for get commands, but I think it would be more > useful if they ignored it - just like they ignore it for conditional > commands. > > That would make it possible for users to only keep a reference to a > cache.getAdvancedCache().withFlags(IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES) and use it for both > read and write operations. > > What do you think? If I was to take the role of a colleague of the person who's written the Infinispan code, it'd be very confused to see a cache reference created with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES being used for a get() operation… I can see myself thinking: "Why on earth do you call get with IGNORE_RETURN_VALUES?" > > Cheers > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev -- Galder Zamarreño gal...@redhat.com twitter.com/galderz Project Lead, Escalante http://escalante.io Engineer, Infinispan http://infinispan.org _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
