At our meeting last week, there was a debate about the fact that the (various) off-heap buffer usage proposals, including NIO2 reads, would potentially be slower because of it potentially needing more "native" invocations.
At the following link you can see the full list of methods which will actually be optimised using "intrinsics" i.e. being replaced by the compiler as it was a macro with highly optimized ad-hoc code which might be platform dependant (or in other words, which will be able to take best advantage of the capabilities of the executing platform): http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/awt/hotspot/file/d61761bf3050/src/share/vm/classfile/vmSymbols.hpp In particular, note the "do_intrinsic" qualifier marking all uses of Unsafe and the NIO Buffer. Hope you'll all agree now that further arguing about any of this will be dismissed unless we want to talk about measurements :-) Kudos to all scepticals (always good), still let's not dismiss the large work needed for this yet, nor let us revert from the rightful path until we know we've tried it to the end: I do not expect to see incremental performance improvements while we make progress, it might even slow down until we get to the larger rewards. Cheers, Sanne _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev