On 01/27/2014 09:20 AM, Sanne Grinovero wrote: > On 23 January 2014 18:03, Dan Berindei <dan.berin...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 22 Jan 2014 16:10, "Pedro Ruivo" <pe...@infinispan.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 01/22/2014 01:58 PM, Dan Berindei wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> It would also require us to keep a Set<K> for each group, with the keys >>>> associated with that group. As such, I'm not sure it would be a lot >>>> easier to implement (correctly) than FineGrainedAtomicMap. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Dan, I didn't understand why do we need to keep a Set<K>. Can you >>> elaborate? >> >> >> We'd need some way to keep track of the keys that are part of the group, >> iterating over the entire cache for every getGroup() call would be way too >> slow. > > Right, and load all entries from any CacheStore too :-/
IMO, I prefer to iterate over the data container and cache loader when it is needed than keep the Set<K> for each group. I think the memory will thank you > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev > _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
