On Mar 13, 2014, at 22:17, Sanne Grinovero <sa...@infinispan.org> wrote:
> On 13 March 2014 22:05, Mircea Markus <mmar...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Mar 13, 2014, at 20:59, Ales Justin <ales.jus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> - also important to notice that we will have both an Hadoop and an >>>> Infinispan cluster running in parallel: the user will interact with the >>>> former in order to run M/R tasks. Hadoop will use Infinispan (integration >>>> achieved through InputFormat and OutputFormat ) in order to get the data >>>> to be processed. >>> >>> Would this be 2 JVMs, or you can trick Hadoop to start Infinispan as well >>> -- hence 1JVM? >> >> good point, ideally it should be a single VM: reduced serialization cost (in >> vm access) and simpler architecture. That's if you're not using C/S mode, of >> course. > > ? > Don't try confusing us again on that :-) > I think we agreed that the job would *always* run in strict locality > with the datacontainer (i.e. in the same JVM). Sure, an Hadoop client > would be connecting from somewhere else but that's unrelated. we did discuss the possibility of running it over hotrod though, do you see a problem with that? Cheers, -- Mircea Markus Infinispan lead (www.infinispan.org) _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
