Hi all, as spotted by the testsuite - which was rightfully complaining - the CHMv8 which we backported from the JDK has a static ThreadLocal that it uses internally.
Our copy is having the same, and so Dan enhanced the "ThreadLocal detection" utility in the testsuite to "allow" specific threadlocal instances; nice as at least infinispan-core now has no more failures. Next the bigger question: this might be ok in the JDK - which obviously doesn't get redeployed - but is it ok in our stuff? I guess the answer is no.. would you all agree that the CHM instances should share an instance whose lifecycle has to be managed by the CacheManager ? Cheers, Sanne _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
