Read my email from Dec 9th and the one from today and let me know which question is not sufficiently answered. I can try and clarify or refine.
> On 15 Dec 2016, at 14:36, Tristan Tarrant <ttarr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 12/12/16 16:13, Sanne Grinovero wrote: >> In short, what's the ultimate goal? > > I think that is the most important question, and we really need to make > sure that the requirements are such that they fit with Infinispan's > model, or they can achieved without fundamentally turning Infinispan > into something it is not. > > Ultimately this is about making a scalable transaction log with variable > durability which can be regularly rebased if we can be certain that > consumers have kept up. Does Debezium provide a checkpoint notification > mechanism to implement this ? > Such a log needs to reliably survive both "normal" rebalancing (+/- 1 > node) as well as downscaling of the cluster (i.e. the remaining nodes > will still need to hold the log for when the cluster was bigger until > rebase time). > > Tristan > -- > Tristan Tarrant > Infinispan Lead > JBoss, a division of Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > infinispan-dev mailing list > infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
