> On 16 Dec 2016, at 09:48, Tristan Tarrant <ttarr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 16/12/16 09:34, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>> Yes, the above design is what sprung to mind initially. Not sure about >>> the need of keeping the log in memory, as we would probably need some >>> form of persistent log for cache shutdown. Since this looks a lot like >>> the append-log of the Artemis journal, maybe we could use that. >> >> Well, when the cache is shut down, don’t we have time to empty the in-memory >> log? > > Cache shutdown should not be deferred because there is a backlog of > events that haven't been forwarded to Debezium, so we would want to pick > up from where we were when we restart the cache.
But you’re willing to wait for the Artemis journal finish writing? I don’t quite see the difference. _______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list infinispan-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
