+1 for interchangeable apis +1 for infinispan-api module On 04/20/2017 05:06 PM, Tristan Tarrant wrote: > On 20/04/2017 15:34, Dan Berindei wrote: >>> How big is the DSL API surface (which will be brought into commons)? >> -1 from me to add anything in commons, I don't think allowing the >> users to query both embedded caches and remote caches with the same >> code is that important. I'd rather go the opposite way and remove the >> BasicCache interface completely. > Actually, we've had requests for interchangeable APIs... > > So, according to your strategy we either have each feature implemented > with a divergent specific embedded or remote API, or each feature has > its own feature-api with two separate feature-embedded and > feature-remote implementations. Both plans sound terrible. > > Alternatively, we could go with an infinispan-api package (which Paul > has been advocating for a long time) which would contain the various > interfaces. > > Tristan >
_______________________________________________ infinispan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
