[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/12/2000 04:52:30 PM
>Locking help the concurency if moved to it's place. Right now the locks are
>everywhere, and at least in my shop, like many others, is wasting CVS and
>enforces the locking ALL THE TIME. So, the current implementation does not
>help concurency. To completely remove the locks will wipe out the tool from
>many areas. THe only way to go is to do it(locking) better....

I don't quite understand your point.  Are you saying that "cvs edit -c" and (the
forthcoming) "cvs ci -c" isn't enough?  If so, why not?

Noel

Reply via email to