[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/17/2000 06:35:59 PM
>I differ with Noel: I think that it is absolute anathema to have CVS work
>without a login account on the server.
>
>However, I agree with Noel about minimizing sysadmin involvement.
>Sysadmin should only be required to set up user accounts.
>The setup of the CVS project, repository, management of permissions,
>etc., none of it should require sysadmin involvement.
>This is one of the biggest reasons I am pro-network filesystems
>and against servers.
Just to clarify, do you think it's better for users to have:
0. no account on the server (eg use a group account)? From your previous posts,
I think not, but I just wanted this list to be as complete as possible.
1. a user account (that they can't use to login to the server).
2. a login account.
Noel
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
