"Richard J. Duncan" wrote:
> It seems arbitrary that it operates on only modified files, do people
> really like this. So far I have seen a lot of "it is right because it
> is the way it is," not "it is right because it seems the proper
> interface."
I might argue the side for the existing implementation & associated process
simply because I'd be annoyed with anyone on my team that kept having me sent 20
individual emails because they didn't want to type out (or copy & paste) a single
filename before they started editing in some heavily populated directory.
And then I'd get another 20 emails when they checked in their single file.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
Funny noises are not funny.
Funny noises are not funny.
Funny noises are not funny...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
