Derek is correct. Another downside, though, is that VAJ's formatting of
the code isn't very good. As I recall, it removes all blank lines and
the indentation is poor. So, people are always tempted to reformat. We
migrated away from VAJ before the new version came out - the one
supporting JDK1.2. I think this version must be out by now. Perhaps the
formating has improved.
-Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: derek.price [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 9:07 AM
To: derek.price; Chuck.Irvine
Cc: Info-Cvs; rdelaney
Subject: Re: CVS and Visual Age for Java
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One problem we experienced is that VAJ, upon extract to a CVS
workspace,
> would re-format the entire source file. This plays havac with CVS's
> concept of simultaneous editing of the same file by different
> developers, i.e. the probability of merge conflicts goes up
> dramatically. This could force you to adopt CVS's optional check-out
> mode - don't know what you call it.
If VAJ's reformatting is minimal after the first pass, checking
everything
out once and back in could mostly avoid this problem.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect (
http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
The Gothic idea that we were to look backwards instead of forwards for
the
improvement of the human mind, and to recur to the annals of our
ancestors for
what is most perfect in government, in religion and in learning, is
worthy of
those bigots in religion and government by whom it has been recommended,
and
whose purposes it would answer. But it is not an idea which this
country will
endure.
- Thomas Jefferson to Joseph Priestley, 1800
