That's the situation I'm in now and, as you note, it's OK. For one 3rd
party tree, however, it's really not working. Hence the split repository
idea.
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Larry Jones wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > With the proliferation of anonymous CVS repositories, I see the
> > opportunity to stop importing 3rd party sources into a local
> > repository. The question is how to handle my changes to the source,
> > i.e. I'd like a split repository - the remote repository to have the
> > trunk and the local repository to have the branch.
> >
> > Any one have a solution?
>
> I usually don't worry about a branch. My changes usually aren't big
> enough to be worth versioning, so I just keep them in my sandbox that's
> checked out from the public repository.
>
> -Larry Jones
>
> This sounds suspiciously like one of Dad's plots to build my character.
> -- Calvin
>
