>> Indeed ... my implication later in the message was that no such change
>> should be entertained. I should have made that clear at the outset in
>> hindsight.

LS> Why not? Surely you don't want to discourage people from discussing
LS> the subject and perhaps coming up with a solution that would make
LS> *everyone* happy...

<g>
Well, it was just that I rambled on a bit and then contradicted
everything I'd said (or at least put into a different perspective <g>)
with a brief paragraph at the end.

Reminds me that I should take caare to read my emails through
carefully after writing and before sending to make sure they actually
make make sense.

ttfn,
J.



_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Reply via email to