>> Indeed ... my implication later in the message was that no such change >> should be entertained. I should have made that clear at the outset in >> hindsight. LS> Why not? Surely you don't want to discourage people from discussing LS> the subject and perhaps coming up with a solution that would make LS> *everyone* happy... <g> Well, it was just that I rambled on a bit and then contradicted everything I'd said (or at least put into a different perspective <g>) with a brief paragraph at the end. Reminds me that I should take caare to read my emails through carefully after writing and before sending to make sure they actually make make sense. ttfn, J. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endings in general Derek R. Price
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endings in general Mike Castle
- RE: Spaces added ... and line endings in general Graeme . Vetterlein
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endings in genera... Laine Stump
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endings in ge... Eric Siegerman
- Re[2]: Spaces added ... and line ending... James Lyon
- Re[4]: Spaces added ... and line en... James Lyon
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endin... David H. Thornley
- [OT]Re: Spaces added ... and l... Lan Barnes
- Re[2]: Spaces added ... and li... James Lyon
- Re: Spaces added ... and l... James Lyon
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endings i... Laine Stump
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endin... Pascal J. Bourguignon
- Re: Spaces added ... and line ... Larry Jones
- Re: Spaces added ... and line endin... David H. Thornley
- FW: Spaces added ... and line endings in general Graeme . Vetterlein