On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:11:18AM -0700, Paul Sander wrote:
> Due to the way that the filesystem works, if the original is open for
> reading at the time of the rename, it remains open with the old data,
> and gets removed when it's closed. So the sandbox gets the correct
> data.
There's a WinNT/2000 server now, isn't there? (I wouldn't use it
unless forced, and I haven't been forced, so I haven't bothered
keeping up :-) What are Windows's rename semantics?
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
