Hi folks, Does moving / renaming a file in CVS necessarily mean that the "new" file ends up at version 1.1? I followed the instructions at the (excellent) red-bean CVS tutorial thusly : floss$ mv oldname newname floss$ cvs remove oldname floss$ cvs add newname floss$ cvs ci -m "renamed oldname to newname" oldname newname and found that the "newname" file started at version 1.1. Is this situation avoidable? Regards, Constantine. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version infor... Hondros, Constantine
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Laine Stump
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Richard Sharp
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Hondros, Constantine
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Thornley, David
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses vers... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files loses ... Laine Stump
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files lo... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming fil... Laine Stump
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming fil... Tanaka Akira
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming... Greg A. Woods