Hi,
I don't see how the cvswrappers file can help me, because for the *same*
files I would like to see a different behavior, depending on the command.
When I check-out/check-in source files, I would like the keyword
substitutions to take place, e.g., I would like $Revision$ to be expanded to
the version of the file.
When I merge source files (in branches), I would like to avoid the keyword
substitutions so that I don't get "false conflicts" about the keywords.
Is there a solution for this? Is there a simple utility that eliminates the
"false conflicts" generated by the keyword substitution?
I read that I can determine a filter to work on each file based on its name
when the file is checked-out or checked-in, however, the manual also says
that these options are not available when you work in a client/server model.
(We currently don't use client/server, but we'll do so soon.)
Thanks,
Shlomo
-----Original Message-----
From: John Minnihan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 8:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Merging different types of files
Define the file handling in cvswrappers, such that the expansion mode is
appropriately applied on a per file basis rather than wholesale via a
command
line switch.
This technique is discussed in many places (probably this list archive for
starters).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and in general we're interested in the keyword substitution feature for
the
> text files. However, the binary files are stored in the repository with
the
> "-kb" option, to prevent the keyword substitution and the line-ending
> conversions from taking place.
>
> What is the right way to merge such a project?
-----
John Minnihan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.freepository.com
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
