On Wednesday, 11. July 2001 20:57, Mike Castle wrote:
> So when are you going to contribute the code that does it?
That is *one* aspect. But I fear that -- even if someone did provide a
patch (+ ChangeLog entry + sanity test case + ...) -- there might quite
a good chance that the time was wasted because it would be rejected.
Is there consensus among the developers with write access to the CVS source
that the cases in which a file which was added with -kb needs to be checked
out / updated / exported with keyword handling any other than -kb are so
rare that a patch implementing the suggested change would be accepted?
Regards
Ingolf
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
