>--- Forwarded mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I can't seem to find any relevant information on this question (and I
>hope I don't start a total flame-fest).
>Is subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) the future of CVS, or is
>it being developed by a totally separate group of individuals?
It's a different group of individuals.
>And has subversion been looked at close enough to be determined that it
>would be a desirable direction to go for current CVS users?
Their stated goal is to make Subversion be command-line compatible with
CVS, only with fewer problems (e.g. fast application of tags, ability
to reorganize the source tree, extensible merge mechanism). Their one
big hole right now is a viable tool to convert a CVS repository into a
Subversion repository.
>--- End of forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
