Nicholas Catanchin writes: > > OK Hang on... Your suggestion uses the '-r' parameter, not '-j'. Do they > both work the same?
That was a typo on my part -- -j is correct. -Larry Jones Good gravy, whose side are you on?! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
