On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 04:55:17AM +0000, E B wrote: > $pwd > /some/unknown/directory > $cvs -L /home/jim/work add newfile
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 12:46:35AM -0500, Larry Jones wrote: > I don't see where this is something CVS should need to do. I agree that his suggested syntax is cumbersome. But look behind that, and what he really needs is simply that CVS follow standard UNIX file-naming semantics: given that /a/b/sandbox is in fact a CVS sandbox, why should CVS care which of these is used to name a file c/d within it? cd /a/b/sandbox/c; cvs XXX d cd /a/b/sandbox; cvs XXX c/d cvs XXX /a/b/sandbox/c/d As with other UNIX commands, these three sequences should behave identically. One likely response is, "nobody's written the code; if you want to, feel free." Fair enough. But that's a very different answer from "CVS *should not* do this". -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / One ring to rule the mall. - Movie review headline, eye Magazine _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs