--- "Mark A. Flacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas S Urban > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas> > Thomas> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:59:48 -0500, Greg > A. Woods sent 2.8K bytes: > >> "dynamic binding" isn't a feature you could ever > possibly decide on > >> needing up front for any kind of project you'd > ever even get close to > >> justifying C for! Get real! > Thomas> > Thomas> You're wrong. Read what I wrote again. > Projects I am working on satisfy > Thomas> the description I gave. Then again, I'm not > real, but I'm working on > Thomas> it. > > In this case, he's correct. After all, if you need > dynamic binding, then > you can't use C and therefore can't justify using it > for said project. :-)
Actually, I've used dynamic binding in C -- I just had to create manually the vtbl's :-) Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion! http://greetings.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
