"Pierre Asselin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message a92viq$oed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:a92viq$oed$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In <PkXs8.421$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Jay Glanville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >Thanks Martin. It's a good start, but not all that I was looking for. By > >using the "-d" option, what I'm doing is "front-loading" the naming > >architecture. In other words, anytime I use module amp1, it will be under a > >directory tools > > I create dummy modules for that purpose. For example, > > amp1 path/to/amp1 > amp2 path/to/amp2 > _amp1 -d tools/amp1 path/to/amp1 > mod path/to/mod &_amp1 &2 > > The convention is that a module beginning with an underscore is not > meant to be checked out by itself --although nothing prevents you to. >
Thanks Pierre. This makes sense. JDG _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
