Larry Jones wrote: > A bit of both, I suspect.
That's good to know. In any case, I'll take a closer look at the CVSNT stuff (I wish they hadn't gone and reformatted all their sources so much :-/), and see what's portable back to the main line.. Some basic features ("cvs passwd", "cvs ls", etc.) should be easy to backport. Others (ACLs, all the NT-specific stuff, etc.) may be a lot more messy, and probably won't be solid enough to pass muster anyway (so this long argument may be moot, for all you know..) -- Shankar. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs