This is the second reply that implies that .rhosts is superior to pserver - can someone explain why?
I had to make this decision recently and concluded that pserver was the prefered way...
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods)
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/11/2002 21:56
|
To: Mahantesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts |
[ On Tuesday, November 12, 2002 at 19:28:49 (+0530), Mahantesh wrote: ]
> Subject: Moving to Pserver from .rhosts
>
> we have working repository running right now. Currently the mode of
> authentication is .rhosts.
> We are planning to migrate the mode of authentication to pserver. Also
> after moving to pserver mode we should be
> able have all the versions we have right now.
Why would you ever even dream of doing that?
Why not upgrade to SSH (and ~/.shosts :-) instead?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
