Fabian Cenedese writes: > > As far as I followed the discussions here I think that the problem is not > the main transport over ethernet but the real (not fully lockable) cvs > operation on the server if you access a NFS repository with :local: > Only if the server cvs does the operation itself it can lock it and therefore > the need for a cvs server protocol.
No, the problem is that NFS is a horribly complex protocol and many (if not most) NFS implementations contain bugs. Although they nearly always work correctly when the client and server systems are running the same code, they frequently do *not* work correctly when the client and server are running different code. -Larry Jones Isn't it sad how some people's grip on their lives is so precarious that they'll embrace any preposterous delusion rather than face an occasional bleak truth? -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs