On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 08:37:12PM +0200, Reinstein, Shlomo wrote:
> I also checked that this strange behavior was not fixed in CVS 1.11.1p1. I
> don't know about the newer versions (e.g., 1.15.1), I will check this as
> well.
Darn! I was really hoping that was it. Well, maybe it's fixed
in 1.11.5, but this new data point makes me less hopeful of that.
> What's wrong with the repository being on NFS?
Larry summed that up admirably.
Since you have a small reproducible test, could you try it with
the repo *not* NFS-mounted, but local to the CVS server? Even if
it still fails (as I half-suspect it will), at least we can stop
harping on the NFS thing and look elsewhere :-) So whichever the
outcome, it won't have been wasted effort.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
A distributed system is one on which I cannot get any work done,
because a machine I have never heard of has crashed.
- Leslie Lamport
Or has an NFS implementation that won't interoperate with mine.
- me
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
