[ On Wednesday, April 2, 2003 at 13:51:42 (-0600), Brian G. Peterson wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Ignore local changes?
>
> > Eric Siegerman writes:
> > >
> > > CVS should probably print a warning in this case, but it doesn't.
> >
> > "This case" is updating a file with a sticky tag or date, which seems
> > like a good idea to me, too. Anyone disagree?
> >
> > -Larry Jones
>
> I agree.
>
> A warning like
> cvs update myproject
> ...
> myfile.c skipped: remove sticky tag x to update
> ...
>
> Would be very useful. How does this suggestion become a formal feature
> request to the development team?
I think warnings like this are generally less useful and are more
confusing than simple status indicators.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
