On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:25:09PM +1000, Matthew Herrmann wrote:
> Given what HEAD means, it should never make sense to run:
> cvs up -rHEAD
Occasionally one might want a sticky tag on HEAD -- probably not
for an entire sandbox, but for a file or two. This came up a
couple of months ago:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2003-04/msg00023.html
(The only reason I didn't suggest typing exactly "-r HEAD" is
that I didn't think of it at the time...)
> Given that, can the "up -r" option refuse to take "HEAD" as a tag? HEAD is
> already a 'magic' tag so it's not as if this will cause CVS to lose
> generality.
Given that, and also given "principle of least surprise", "-r
HEAD" should do what "-r any-other-revision-tag" does.
> If one of the cvs maintainers is listening, can this be put on the wish
> list?
-1
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| | /
When I came back around from the dark side, there in front of me would
be the landing area where the crew was, and the Earth, all in the view
of my window. I couldn't help but think that there in front of me was
all of humanity, except me.
- Michael Collins, Apollo 11 Command Module Pilot
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
