On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 14:53, Greg A. Woods wrote: > [ On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 at 10:10:46 (-0400), Tom Copeland wrote: ] > > Subject: Re: Countering the usual diatribe against binary files, was Re: cvs > > diff, proposal for change > > > > Hm. Do CVS branches not work right with binary files? > > It depends on what you mean by "work". Merging branches containing > binary files is one heck of a lot more work.
Cool, yup, right, merging binary files isn't going to happen. I guess I was just kind of wondering if there was something about a binary file that would, I don't know, break a branch or something, such that someone couldn't check out the branch, or the files would get mixed up with files in other branches, or something like that. Sounds like that shouldn't be a problem.... Thanks, Tom -- Tom Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> InfoEther _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
