On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 11:52:19AM -0800, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > CVS is a more mature product and needs to move a bit more conservatively > oriented when considering large changes in how it works. I suspect there > will be a place for cvs even after svn 1.0 is released.
I know, it's easy to turn a mature, useful and complicated project like cvs in a complete mess. Except for some exoteric uses, CVS fits the bill of 95% of our versioning needs, and I've been using it for 2 years know without major complains. Those 5% missing is due to the lack of copy/move/rename changes in a repository (at least in my opinion). Maybe some way of recording, alongside with the diffs, the file name of a revision, I don't know. RCS doesn't give us the flexibility needed :( Rodolfo Lima. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
