[ On Friday, December 19, 2003 at 21:00:46 (-0500), Larry Jones wrote: ] > Subject: Re: CVS security audit? > > The objection is that CVS was never *designed*, or even *intended*, to > be secure. An audit will affect my confidence not one whit -- it's > sufficient to keep honest people honest, nothing more.
Indeed. I couldn't agree more. Furthermore CVS was designed to use any sufficiently transparent remote job execution protocol that could have a wrapper put around it such that it works like rsh. What more could anyone ask for than to leave both communications _and_ security to some other specialized tools? -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs