[ On Wednesday, May 26, 2004 at 17:03:38 (-0700), Mark D. Baushke wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Distributed Development Environments
>
> See:
>
> http://www.taniwha.org/bitkeeper.html
>
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/2107
>
> for what other folks have written about it.
You mean "for what other folks have written about bitkeeper licensing".
The documents at those links say nothing substantial or useful about how
the tool works, what it can do, and how to use it.
BitKeeper is not free. So what?
> Note: it does seem kind of odd to ask a the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
> list (a list run by the GNU organization that promotes Free Software)
> for information on a closed source product...
Indeed, bitkeeper is not CVS and the info-cvs list is not a great place
to discuss very much about bitkeeper (except perhaps as its users and
uses directly relate in some significant way to CVS).
Neither is info-cvs a good forum for whining about some other software
product's licencing policy. :-)
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP RoboHack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
