"Mark D. Baushke" wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jean-Christian Imbeault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > > > > > For an example of one of the threads, follow this link: > > > > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2002-05/msg00149.html > > > > > > http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-01/msg00024.html > > > > This looks exactly like the kind of thing that would accomplish what > > we want to do! > > > Unfortunately the links in these threads for the patches point to a > > web site that no longer exists :( > > Well, Claus Henriksen probably still reads this list and might post new > patches for you... > > Of course, the point I was trying to make in that thread was that it is > POSSIBLE to do the same thing without any of the patches to cvs being > necessary. > Mark, would cvs_acls[1] in the source tarball, or cvs_acls2[2] be more direct pointers to what he wants, with out having to patch CVS?
[1] cvs-1.11.16/contrib/cvs_acls.in [2][sorry only had the tarball from 1.11.16 available so I don't know if cvs_acls2 has been merged later.] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-03/msg00401.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=cvs_acls2&idxname=info-cvs&max=20&result=normal&sort=score -- Todd Denniston Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
