Rachel Suddeth (Bloodhound Software) wrote: > ? That is, would you save versions of things like > executables, p-code, or DLLs? My gut says no, better to pull > the source code for the version/revision we want to > run/test/distrubute and compile from that whenever we need > it. But what do people generally do? Your instincts are correct. Use CVS to manage files that cannot be recreated by an automated process. For example, your source files (C, C++, etc.), makefiles, and so on. CVS works best with mergeable text files, but it can also handle binary files such as images (.bmp, .gif, etc.) that are not generated by some build process.
-- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
